PharmacoVig_BOS said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Pushing back on PharmacoVig_BOS here. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
PharmacoVig_BOS said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
PharmacoVig_BOS said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
lisa_labSD said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Second this.