SleepDoc_PDX said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Closing the loop on my own question.
Closing this out: I held the step for six weeks rather than four and it settled without a dose change. The interval was the answer, not the dose.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after SleepDoc_PDX’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
TirzTom said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Happy to go further on any of that.