PharmacoVig_BOS said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Pushing back on PharmacoVig_BOS here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
PharmacoVig_BOS said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
PharmacoVig_BOS said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
PharmHunterJen said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Same pattern here, and in the same order.