Apr 19, 2026 at 8:04 AM#16
Dr.SportsMedIN said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
47 20denise_HTX, raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 20, 2026 at 10:54 PM#17
One thing that is still open after KevinCompounds’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
48 21TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD, JennaRN and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 22, 2026 at 1:43 PM#18
TrialTracker_MD said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Last edited: Apr 22, 2026 at 2:43 PM
49 22AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsApr 24, 2026 at 4:31 AM#19
TrialTracker_MD said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
50 23labquiet_amy, emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report