TrialTracker_MD said:Update — my curve sits below the published mean and the explanation is that the trial arm had support I do not have.
Pushing back on TrialTracker_MD here. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
TrialTracker_MD said:Update — my curve sits below the published mean and the explanation is that the trial arm had support I do not have.
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
TrialTracker_MD said:Update — my curve sits below the published mean and the explanation is that the trial arm had support I do not have.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.
Dr.Martinez said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Second this. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.