MASHdoc_SA said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
MASHdoc_SA said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
MASHdoc_SA said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
ingrid_STO said:Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Nothing to add that would improve it.