Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
One thing that is still open after wanda_boise’s answer:
Whether an unchanged LDL-C alongside a large triglyceride fall is a good result or a bad one, because ApoB and LDL-C seem to be telling different stories?
pete_nash said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
I read this differently from pete_nash, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultspete_nash said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.