Jul 15, 2025 at 4:40 AM#16
Dr.RenalNash said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
26 24ingrid_STO, pete_nash, hank_denver and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jul 16, 2025 at 9:09 AM#17
PeptideChemSF said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
Second this.
27 0LeilaHI, marcus_mpls, DeniseRN_TPA and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jul 17, 2025 at 1:37 PM#18
PeptideChemSF said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
Coming at PeptideChemSF’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Last edited: Jul 17, 2025 at 6:37 PM
28 1HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg, bri_stats and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsJul 18, 2025 at 6:05 PM#19
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
29 2andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP, GraceAZ_72 and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report