PeptideChemSF said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
PeptideChemSF said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsTinaHashiRN said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
TinaHashiRN said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Coming at TinaHashiRN’s question from a different direction. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.