DebRD_ATL said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
tammy_FL said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.
DebRD_ATL said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Pushing back on DebRD_ATL here. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne concrete data point for the thread. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.