Dr.BariatricHTX said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
One concrete data point for the thread. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Dr.ObesityMed said:The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
Coming at Dr.ObesityMed’s question from a different direction. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after Dr.RheumBOS’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Reporting back.
Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.