MikeKY_noInsulin said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
I read this differently from MikeKY_noInsulin, on substance rather than tone. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
MikeKY_noInsulin said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
MikeKY_noInsulin said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
sarah_TO said:Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Posting only so the count is not one.