Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
dave_SLC said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsTrialNerd_Beth said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Posting only so the count is not one.